JS Tip 503: Reality Check II: Credibility Demands Examination

We’ve been talking about fact and fiction. About separating the true from the false.

Last week, we talked about the need for specifics. About examples—specific examples—that support a statement. 

This week, we’ll talk about the need for examination. What can we trust? 

This is the second tip of a short series.  

“I read it on the internet, so it has to be true.” 

This used to be a joke. It’s not funny anymore. 

Be skeptical of everything: “Trust no one” is good advice. 

Ask three questions: 

• Does the statement present only one side of the argument? The best way to assess this is to check other accounts of the matter. Read and research.

• Might the statement have a hidden agenda? Remember and use the Latin phrase Cui bono? (/kwee bone-oh/): “Who benefits?” Bias defeats credibility. Bias obscures facts. Bias serves only itself.

• Does the statement use emotion-based language? Does it include exclamation points or all caps? Be wary of any argument that includes puppies, orphans, or threats.

We’ll finish our discussion next week. We love this stuff. 

Giving thanks: We appreciate you. We’re grateful for your trust and interest. Thank you.